Pengaruh Akuntansi Pertanggungjawaban, Kompetensi, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Pt So Good Food Boyolali

Authors

  • Tri Sri Rejeqi Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia
  • Indra Lila Kusuma Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia
  • Maya Widyana Dewi Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/jikab.v4i3.129

Keywords:

Responsibility accounting, competence, organizational commitment, managerial performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of responsibility accounting, competence, and organizational commitment on managerial performance at PT So Good Food Boyolali. Managerial performance is an essential aspect because it reflects the effectiveness of managers in achieving organizational objectives. The study employed a quantitative approach with a survey method, involving 28 respondents who represented all managers in the company. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed through multiple linear regression. The results indicate that responsibility accounting and competence have a positive and significant effect on managerial performance, while organizational commitment does not show a significant influence. Simultaneously, the three variables significantly affect managerial performance with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.865, meaning that 86.5 percent of the variation in managerial performance is explained by the model, while the remaining 13.5 percent is influenced by other factors outside the model. These findings emphasize that managerial performance is largely determined by the effective implementation of responsibility accounting and adequate managerial competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page.

Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development, 27(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810840730

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2012). Cornerstones of cost management (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced management accounting (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Lubis, A., & Suzan, L. (2016). Pengaruh akuntansi pertanggungjawaban terhadap kinerja manajerial. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 11(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2016.v11.i02.p06

Made, N. K., Suartana, I. W., & Wirama, D. G. (2020). The influence of organizational commitment and job satisfaction on employee performance. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 8(2), 789–797.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. SAGE Publications.

Novlina, L., Astuti, E. S., & Rachmawati, E. (2020). Pengaruh sistem informasi manajemen dan kinerja manajerial. Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis dan Ekonomi Asia, 14(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.32812/jibeka.v14i1.190

Rachmaniza, N. (2020). Pengaruh kompetensi terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT XYZ. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 8(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.33365/jmk.v8i2.765

Rahmawati, D. (2022). The effect of organizational commitment on managerial performance: Evidence from Indonesian companies. Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.47742/jbmr.v5i1.240

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Sinaga, A. (2019). Pengaruh kompetensi dan motivasi terhadap kinerja pegawai. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 16(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v16i1.132

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryani, E., Mulyadi, M., & Febrina, L. (2021). Accountability in management control system and its impact on managerial performance. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(2), 45–52.

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7

Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2–3), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.004

Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., & Carroll, S. J. (1963). Development of managerial performance: A research approach. Southwestern Journal of Business and Economics, 1(1), 1–12.

Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115

Widener, S. K. (2006). Associations between strategic resource importance and performance measure use: The impact on firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 17(4), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.03.002

Zimmerman, J. L. (2009). Accounting for decision making and control (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

Rejeqi, T. S., Kusuma, I. L., & Dewi, M. W. (2025). Pengaruh Akuntansi Pertanggungjawaban, Kompetensi, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Pt So Good Food Boyolali. Jurnal Ilmiah Keuangan Akuntansi Bisnis, 4(3), 804–813. https://doi.org/10.53088/jikab.v4i3.129