Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Gross, Net, Dan Gross Up Dalam Perhitungan Pph Pasal 21 Sebagai Alternatif Terbaik

Studi Kasus di PT ABC

Authors

  • Intan Badriyah Marantika Putri Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia
  • Indra Lila Kusuma Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia
  • Wikan Budi Utami Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/jikab.v4i2.137

Keywords:

Income Tax Article 21, gross method, net method, gross-up method, tax effectiveness

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of three calculation methods for Income Tax Article 21, namely the gross, net, and gross-up methods, in order to identify the best alternative for both companies and employees. A case study was conducted at PT ABC using a descriptive qualitative approach through interviews and analysis of employee salary and tax data. The findings reveal that the gross method reached an effectiveness level of 98.09%, the net method 99.04%, while the gross-up method achieved the highest effectiveness at 100.25%. The novelty of this research lies in its comparative approach, which not only measures tax efficiency but also links it to employee welfare and company tax burdens. The results demonstrate that the gross-up method provides the most effective solution, as it improves employees’ take-home pay while maintaining tax efficiency for the company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriady, D. (2019). Analisis perbandingan metode perhitungan PPh Pasal 21 dengan metode gross, net, dan gross up. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, 20(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v20i2.549

Anjarwati, R., Sari, N., & Putra, A. (2021). Analisis penerapan metode perhitungan PPh Pasal 21 terhadap beban pajak perusahaan dan kesejahteraan karyawan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma (JRAM), 12(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.23969/jram.v12i1.3456

Aristiandani, D., Wulandari, S., & Nugroho, Y. (2023). The effect of gross up method on employee motivation and corporate tax efficiency. International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 11(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijat.v11i2.21564

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing.

Kepmendagri. (1996). Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 690.900-327 tentang Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja. Jakarta: Kementerian Dalam Negeri.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Murti, S., & Ridwan, M. (2020). Analisis efektivitas penerapan metode gross up dalam perhitungan PPh 21. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 17(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2020.05

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Pohan, C. A. (2019). Perencanaan pajak: Konsep, teori, dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ramba, J., Sitorus, E., & Hartono, L. (2022). Penerapan metode gross up dalam manajemen pajak perusahaan manufaktur. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 6(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpi.v6i2.2345

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suandy, E. (2011). Perencanaan pajak. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Putri, I. B. M., Kusuma, I. L., & Utami, W. B. (2025). Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Gross, Net, Dan Gross Up Dalam Perhitungan Pph Pasal 21 Sebagai Alternatif Terbaik: Studi Kasus di PT ABC. Jurnal Ilmiah Keuangan Akuntansi Bisnis, 4(2), 779–785. https://doi.org/10.53088/jikab.v4i2.137