Pengaruh Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial

Studi Kasus di Mangano Sushi Sukoharjo

Authors

  • Dwi Sulistanti Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/jikab.v5i2.174

Keywords:

Contingency Theory, management accounting systems, managerial performance, organizational commitment, work motivation

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of management accounting systems, organizational commitment, and work motivation on managerial performance at Mangano Sushi Sukoharjo. This study employed a quantitative approach with an explanatory research design. The population consisted of 60 employees, all of whom were selected using a census sampling technique. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using multiple linear regression after passing validity, reliability, and classical assumption tests. The findings reveal that management accounting systems and work motivation have a positive and significant effect on managerial performance, whereas organizational commitment does not significantly affect managerial performance. These findings indicate that the availability of relevant information to support managerial decision-making and employees' work motivation are associated with improved managerial performance. This study contributes empirical evidence to the management accounting literature from the perspective of Contingency Theory and provides practical implications for organizations in strengthening management accounting systems and enhancing employee motivation to improve managerial performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7

Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2007). Managerial accounting (8th ed.). Thomson South-Western.

Kuntadi, C., & Ramayani, P. Y. (2022). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Perencanaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja: Kepemimpinan, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin, 1(3), 605-613.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., & Carroll, S. J. (1963). Development of managerial performance: A research approach. South-Western Publishing.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842

Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007). Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.08.003

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90031-9

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson.

Rumapea, M., Sinaga, J., & Saragih, R. E. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen, Metode Pengukuran Kinerja Dan Sistem Penghargaan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Rumah Sakit ESTOMIHI Medan. Methomika, 2(1), 63-73.

Sirait, S. A., Nababan, J. A. B., Damanik, J. C., & Rajagukguk, L. S. (2025). Peran praktik akuntansi manajemen dalam meningkatkan efisiensi operasional dan kinerja keuangan pada perusahaan manufaktur. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 3(7), 372-376.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Suprantiningrum, S., & Lukas, A. D. (2021). Sistem informasi akuntansi manajemen, pengendalian manajemen terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan variabel moderating teknologi informasi. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(1), 174-185.

Trisnanda, N. R., Masitoh, E., & Siddi, P. (2022). Penerapan akuntansi pertanggungjawaban, komitmen organisasi, dan sistem pengendalian manajemen terhadap kinerja manajerial. Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 9(1), 157-167.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Sulistanti, D. (2026). Pengaruh Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial : Studi Kasus di Mangano Sushi Sukoharjo. Jurnal Ilmiah Keuangan Akuntansi Bisnis, 5(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.53088/jikab.v5i2.174